Civil employment was provided he got leaving the Police, to count so gratuity Service in that force as pensionable under the ordinary pension minute, the & another 11th clause of that minute warrants such procedure. Though he did but little duty in his new appointment, Jam hidined to think he should have been treated for pension purposes. Under the 83 year average sell the 4½ months passed in that office only tells to a limited extent. He was then refaced vacation on half pay leave (see 6598), so that his retiring allowance dater in mediating from the cagivation of those 4½ months.
Calculated in that way the average for $1328. But it appears from the leave certificate that he drew his so-called Police Good conduct pay up to the date of his leaving the Colony; if this was done deliberately, with the decy of State approval it seems to me that it must be regarded as a sort of Personal Allowance attaching to any appointment he held, & that it would be admissible for pension. Also the leave has been deducted altogether under this Police regulations, but if he was on half pay, I do not see why he should not be treated under the ordinary rules.
His cedien absence in 1871 was, to the best of my recollection, entirely on duty that leave at all. If so beships he has 17 years for pensionable service, this claim may be not to $579, but to which I think he would accept subject to the condition of repaying his passage money - say in instalments spread over 3 or 4 years.
[M. Cleather sect, to have got his passage in because he was penniless]
M: Round
JM1 19/12/27
As regards the Police Good conduct allowance. M- Groy's appointment to be 1st class in the magistracy is given in 20620/86, which says nothing about the retention of this allowance. M-Groy's salary was promoted from 1200 dollars + good conduct allowance to 1920 dollars.
έ
Civil Amployment was, provided he got
leaving the Police, to count
so gratuity
Service in that force as persimable
under the ordinary pension minste, the
& another
11th clause of that minute warrants since receir such procedure. Though he did but
Kal
little duty in his new appointment, Jam
hidined to think the should have been do
treated for pennin purposes. Under th83 year average sell the 41⁄2 months passed
limited
in that office only tells to a Extent. He was then refaced vacation on
in 245470
Treated in
half pay lewe (see 6598), so that his retiring allowance dater in mediating from the cagivation
of those 4 1⁄2 month. __
Calculated in that
Cech makes
t
that way
the Andil-
average for $1328_ But
• father from the leave certificate that he drew his so called Police Good conduct pay up to the date of his leaving the Colony; if this was done deliberatel, with the decy of Stater
approval it seems to me that it must- be regarded as a sort of Personal Allowance attaching to any appointment he held, & that it would beadmissible for pension. Also the heave has
417
been deducted altogether under this Poline
regulations, but if he was on
hot see why
half pay, Ido
he should not be treated under
the ordinary rules
in 1871 was,
His cedien absence
to te best of my recollection
Intively on duty" that leave at all. If so beships he has 17 years for simabletice, this chain may be not to 450g
$579,
butto
which Ithanked think he would
accept tabject to the condition of repaying his passage money-say in instant
Spread on so 3 or 4
years.
[M. Cleather sect, to have got his passage in because he was penniles)
1-1.
M: Round
JM1 19/12/27
-1. As regards the Police Good conduct allowance. M- Geoys' appointment to be 1th chaill in the magistracy is given in 20620/86, which says nothing
about the retention of this allowance.
m-Groy dollars fa
of 120,
of
was fromoted from 1200
+
good
conduct allowance
to 1920 dollars: I see
therefor.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.